ext_81202 ([identity profile] rebness.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rebness 2011-10-30 03:02 pm (UTC)

She's just so daft. He was quoted as saying the theories were interesting, but as in what I linked above, he doesn't believe it. Did you know that they portray Shakespeare as wicked and cowardly and stupid? Because he's poor. FFS.

Agreed on Jacobi. It's insane. Look, playing a character fantastically is brilliant. Well done. But it does not make you a historian, or a Shakespeare scholar. I really enjoyed playing the town crier in our school play. It doesn't make me an expert on campology.

So, so agreed on point 3. You know, I am a French Revolution geek. I can go on and on about it for hours (I have) but I can't even pretend to be anywhere near an expert on what happened, and why, and the far-reaching consequences. I can't even make my mind up about Robespierre! I'm always sceptical of self-proclaimed experts when they're just amateur admirers with an agenda.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting