rebness: (L'Homme Blesse)
rebness ([personal profile] rebness) wrote2005-02-25 12:07 pm
Entry tags:

Tate Liverpool


Went into Liverpool yesterday to get a couple of things. I ended up (finally) with the first part of Les Miserables, some fresh mint and okra, and beer brewed by some trappist monks in the French Alps, or something.

Chris and I went to see the William Blake exhibition at one of the galleries in Liverpool, because Becky + Blake = OTP. Actually, that's a lie, because Yeats would totally make it a menage a trois.

Anyway, we ended up at the Tate on the docks, and were completely side-tracked. There was an excellent exhibition of Cubist works on. I absolutely love that movement, and though [livejournal.com profile] jaffacakequeen and I weren't too impressed with some of Picasso's works at the museum in Barcelona, there were some excellent paintings there. One was a Cubist-style work whereby a woman was reduced to a collage of geometric shapes. It was incredibly eerie.

Seated Nude

Now, museums in Britain are, for the main part, free, right? This is a very good thing, but it also means that they're funded by the taxpayer. I am very happy for my money to go towards art rather than war, but dude... there were two pieces of canvas, right? This was a work by an Iranian artist living in London, and she will have received thousands of pounds for her work.

There was a large piece of white canvas, and a large piece of black canvas, adjacent to one another. That was her entire piece. The notice said that it was "an indictement of Western culture and Western materialsim...a scathing look at religious intolerance."

The hell? I'm all for reading between the lines, but it was two pieces of canvas...arrgh. This means that Ikea must be a veritable mecca for religious expression.

I ranted about it to mum today. She said that the idea is probably to laugh at the well-meaning people and their Emperor's New Clothes who would be so decadent as to pay thousands for such a thing.

I have a sneaking feeling that she's right.

[identity profile] jadedscorpion.livejournal.com 2005-02-26 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
She said that the idea is probably to laugh at the well-meaning people and their Emperor's New Clothes who would be so decadent as to pay thousands for such a thing.

Your mum is a wise woman.

I'm an art major, and I think most modern art is crap. I had to spend a whole semester on Picasso, at least I could respect his art, compared to most. Someone in the comments had it right, no one wants to say something is crap anymore, feeling that they will look stupid for not 'getting it'. There's nothing to get! That guy painted a canvas with three strokes of a squeegee, it's random marks on a canvas, my cat spends more time making a composition in her litterbox if I give her paint.
Course they will tell you that "it's all about the process of making art, not the result".

[identity profile] rebness.livejournal.com 2005-02-28 01:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank God that you agree! I always worry that I'm missing the point with these works, but I swear, it really does look like the cat would spend more time and effort on them. ;)