Robust Cost-Efficient Systems: The New Gold!

[rebness]

Robust cost-efficient systems, man. That's totally where it's at. Wow. I could just go on about them all day, except for now. Because...er...ah...LOOK UP!

Comments

[mothergoddamn.livejournal.com]

Oh man you read my mind! I have a tattoo of it across my back. Robust cost-efficient systems all the way!

[rebness.livejournal.com]

Funny, you never struck me as having a back the size of Quasimodo. Is the tattoo in size 6 lettering?

[mothergoddamn.livejournal.com]

Well we got to "ROBUST" and ran out of room. But the sentiments there.

[saffronlie.livejournal.com]

I think it's the robustity that attracts me the most, more than that cost-efficiency. I love a good robust system.

[rebness.livejournal.com]

Oh, aye. Those cost-efficient systems aren't quite so cost-efficient if they're not robust.

[saffronlie.livejournal.com]

I'd argue that it's the cost-efficiency which really determines the level of robustness in a system.

[rebness.livejournal.com]

Waah I feel like I'm watching a party political broadcast!

[saffronlie.livejournal.com]

Maybe you are, Becky. Maybe you are.

[rebness.livejournal.com]

Mummy, make the evil politician with her dolly mix policies go away now. Mummy? Mummy!

[saffronlie.livejournal.com]

It's a very simple policy. People give me dolly mix. I give people my goodwill. Everybody wins!

[wiebke.livejournal.com]

Well, I'm guessing this is an "in joke" but I swear my first two guesses as to where talk of robust systems came were:

1) spam

and

2) something Tony Blair said (about 25 times in one speech, as a new buzzword).

LOL

[rebness.livejournal.com]

Well, I could admit this was an in-joke... or I could claim it was brilliantly political satire in that it was full of as much meaningless jargon and repetition as a Blair speech.

Yes. Let's go for the former. ;)